884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. HUGO FERREIRA. No. 06-P-1853.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 14, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
Articles Tagged: 884 N.E.2d 552
COMMONWEALTH v. HOMEN, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. JOSEPH HOMEN. No. 07-P-701.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgments reversed. Verdicts set aside.
MONROE v. DeMARCO, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1120 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 ROSALEE MONROE another v. LEO P. DEMARCO, SECOND, trustee. No. 06-P-1773.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Order of April 9, 2004, as amended by order of March 7, 2005, affirmed. Order dated November 15, 2005, denying defendant’s motion for reconsideration affirmed.
DURLING v. ZAGRANIS, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 ROBERT S. DURLING another v. MARGUERITE ZAGRANIS another. No. 07-P-234.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The fourth paragraph of the judgment, enjoining the plaintiffs from interfering with the Zagranises’ lawful use of the way, is affirmed. The remaining three paragraphs of the Page 1120 judgment are […]
COUTURE v. HEATH STREET HOMEOWNERS, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 MICHAEL COUTURE, trustee, v. HEATH STREET HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION others. No. 07-P-444.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 15, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Order allowing, in part, motion for preliminary injunction affirmed.
N.E. v. F.E., 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 N.E. v. F.E. No. 06-P-1797.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 15, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. HILTON, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. ANGELINA M. HILTON. No. 07-P-499.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Decisions and orders of Appellate Division affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. RODRIQUES, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. XISTO D. RODRIQUES. No. 06-P-1350.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 15, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Order of dismissal with prejudice reversed.
COMMONWEALTH v. FELDER, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. KENNETH D. FELDER. No. 07-P-419.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. PIRES, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. MARIA V. PIRES. No. 07-P-700.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. LEVON, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. LEVON L., a juvenile. No. 07-P-1016.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Adjudications of delinquency affirmed.
KOUTROUBIS v. CITY OF LYNN, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1120 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 KONSTADINOS KOUTROUBIS, trustee, others v. CITY OF LYNN others. No. 07-P-678.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
ADOPTION OF KEENAN, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 ADOPTION OF KEENAN. No. 07-P-1536.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Decree affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. BADILLO, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. JASON BADILLO. No. 07-P-335.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Order denying motion to withdraw guilty plea and for new trial affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. WEDGEWORTH, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. ROSCOE B. WEDGEWORTH. No. 07-P-479.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 14, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. ROBINSON, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2008)
884 N.E.2d 552 COMMONWEALTH v. NATHAN ROBINSON (and two companion cases). No. 07-P-864.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The portion of the order allowing the defendants’ motions to suppress evidence found in the residence is reversed, and a new order shall enter denying the motions. The portion of the […]