872 N.E.2d 841 CHARLES F. DYER v. BOARD OF SELECTMEN OF LUNENBERG another. No. 06-P-314.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. August 31, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
Articles Tagged: 872 N.E.2d 841
ROBERTS v. CORR. MED. SERV., 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 BRANDON ROBERTS v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., others. No. 06-P-344.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. September 5, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed. Page 1102
COMMONWEALTH v. CLARK, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 COMMONWEALTH v. KENNETH CLARK. NO. 05-P-1567.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. August 31, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
TIDD v. TOWN OF GEORGETOWN, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 NILSON R. TIDD another v. TOWN OF GEORGETOWN. No. 06-P-1395.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. September 4, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. The judgements are vacated, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court.
SITE, INC. v. PEABODY CONST., 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 SITE, INC v. PEABODY CONSTRUCTION Co., INC., another. No. 06-P-1229.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. August 30, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Order denying motion to vacate judgment and vacate arbitration award affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. PINA, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 COMMONWEALTH v. BRANDON PINA. No. 06-P-986.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. August 31, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
GALVIN v. EXCEL SWITCHING CORP., 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 MARK GALVIN v. EXCEL SWITCHING CORPORATION another. No. 06-P-1495.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. September 4, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
MOSHER v. BD. OF APPEALS, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 CLIFFORD MOSHER v. BOARD OF APPEALS OF NEEDHAM another. No. 06-P-1336.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. August 31, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. KENNEDY, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 COMMONWEALTH v. RUDY E. KENNEDY. No. 06-P-1092.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. September 4, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Orders denying motion for a new trial, motion to revise and revoke sentence, and motion for appointment of counsel affirmed.
ORTIZ v. O’HEARN, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 CHERYL L. ORTIZ v. KATHRYN O’HEARN. No. 06-P-1132.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. September 4, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. LONG, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (2007)
872 N.E.2d 841 COMMONWEALTH v. DAVID LONG. No. 06-P-637.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. September 4, 2007. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.