818 N.E.2d 641 ADOPTION OF ANTOINE (and a companion case). No. 04-P-640.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 24, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Decrees affirmed.
Articles Tagged: 818 N.E.2d 641
COMMONWEALTH v. ESCOBAR, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 COMMONWEALTH vs. JULIO ESCOBAR. No. 03-P-1620.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 24, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Judgments affirmed.
JOAN DIVER’S CASE, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 JOAN DIVER’S CASE. No. 04-P-1039.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 30, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Decision of the reviewing board affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. CIAMPI, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 COMMONWEALTH vs. DENNIS CIAMPI. No. 03-P-1651.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 24, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Order denying defendant’s motion to revise and revoke sentences imposed on March 28, 2000, affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. WOOD, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 COMMONWEALTH vs. KEVIN WOOD. No. 03-P-1371.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. December 1, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Order denying motion for new trial affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. RUIZ-SANTOS., 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 COMMONWEALTH vs. JUAN RUIZ-SANTOS. No. 03-P-1502.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 24, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Judgment affirmed.
MICHAEL GRAZIANO’S CASE, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 MICHAEL GRAZIANO’S CASE. No. 04-P-946.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 30, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Decision of reviewing board affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. GONZALES, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 COMMONWEALTH vs. HIRAM GONZALES. No. 03-P-1654.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 24, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. VASQUEZ, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 COMMONWEALTH vs. EDWARD VASQUEZ. No. 03-P-1400.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 24, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. ROCKWOOD, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 COMMONWEALTH vs. PETER ROCKWOOD. No. 03-P-1546.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 26, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Order allowing defendant’s motion to suppress evidence is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the District Court for trial.
STEPHEN PERCOCO’S CASE, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 STEPHEN PERCOCO’S CASE. No. 04-P-1008.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 30, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Decision of the reviewing board dated December 11, 2000, affirmed.
MICHAEL HOOD’S CASE, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 MICHAEL HOOD’S CASE. No. 04-P-1028.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 30, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Decision of the reviewing board affirmed.
KILBURN v. ESTATE OF UEHLEIN, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
818 N.E.2d 641 ANDREW WILLIAM KILBURN, SR. vs. ESTATE OF EDWARD C. UEHLEIN. No. 04-P-329.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. December 1, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Judgment affirmed.