810 N.E.2d 862 Irene Tilton vs. Claire Chalifour. No. 03-P-810.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 16, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
Articles Tagged: 810 N.E.2d 862
ZERBE v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF GLOUCESTER, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Robert Zerbe vs. Zoning Board of Appeals of Gloucester another. No. 02-P-81.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 18, 2004. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed. Page 1112
COMMONWEALTH v. SILVA, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Commonwealth vs. Filisangelo Silva. No. 03-P-828.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 18, 2004. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
JENNINGS v. HOBAN, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Leona A. Jennings vs. Marsilia A. Hoban; Richard Jennings another, third-party defendants. No. 03-P-984.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 18, 2004. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
REYNOLDS v. SZYMANSKI, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Walter Reynolds others vs. John Szymanski. No. 02-P-1277.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 16, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment on count II affirmed.
KOENIG v. CONNOLLY, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Jo Anne E. Koenig vs. James A. Connolly, Third, others. No. 03-P-889.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 16, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
WINGE v. ANDREWS, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Carol Winge vs. William H. Andrews, Jr. No. 03-P-762.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 16, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. DUFF, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Commonwealth vs. Richard W. Duff. No. 03-P-785.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 18, 2004. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgments on Count I, breaking and entering in the nighttime with the intent to commit a felony, and Count II, larceny in a building, affirmed. Judgment on Count III vacated, verdict set aside and […]
COMMONWEALTH v. GOMES, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Commonwealth vs. Michael S. Gomes. No. 02-P-1517.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 16, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
GOLDSMITH v. GOLDSMITH, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 David Mark Goldsmith vs. Lisa Kritz Goldsmith. No. 03-P-1095.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 18, 2004. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Contempt judgment on motion for contempt filed January 30, 2003, affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. DELEON, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Commonwealth vs. Elacio Rosario Deleon. No. 03-P-537.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 18, 2004. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
SCHEBEL v. GAULIN, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Joseph Schebel vs. Lynn Gaulin. No. 02-P-814.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 16, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment of modification affirmed.
RUDEL v. MacKINNON, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Amy C. Rudel vs. Richard MacKinnon. No. 03-P-746.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 16, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment of modification affirmed. Order denying motion for relief from judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. MILES, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Commonwealth vs. Jonathan Miles. No. 03-P-1006.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 22, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
MULDOON v. LaCHANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Emmett S. Muldoon vs. Lachance Financial Services, Inc. No. 03-P-728.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 21, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Decision of the Appellate Division affirmed.
SIMONCINI v. BERKSHIRE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Joseph A. Simoncini, Jr., another vs. Berkshire Mutual Insurance Company. No. 03-P-1184.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 16, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
LIPP v. NOLAN, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Albert W. Lipp vs. Christine M. Nolan. No. 03-P-466.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 21, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Order entered February 7, 2003, affirmed.
ADOPTION OF ANNABELLE, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Adoption of Annabelle (and three companion cases). No. 03-P-1296.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 22, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Decrees affirmed.
ATTERIDGE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Marc S. Atteridge vs. Department of Correction. No. 03-P-1023.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 16, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. The judgment is vacated, the order denying the motion to join a party needed for just adjudication of the claim is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for […]
COMMONWEALTH v. JACKSON, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2004)
810 N.E.2d 862 Commonwealth vs. Dijuan Jackson. No. 03-P-509.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 18, 2004. DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgments affirmed.