Articles Tagged: 80 Mass. App. Ct. 1114

ROBERT J. MURPHY v. PLANNING BOARD OF WEST TISBURY. No. 11-P-307.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 9, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. The judgment is vacated, and a new judgment shall enter directing the board to endorse the plan in the manner described by G.L. c. 41, § 81P. Page 906

COMMONWEALTH v. TRANACE WELLS. No. 11-P-1475.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 9, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Order denying motion to credit defendant with time spent in pretrial confinement reversed. Defendant shall be credited with sixty-three days on sentence imposed on September 29, 2010, in indictment no. SUCR2009-10804.

ADOPTION OF TESS (and five companion cases). No. 11-P-693.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 8, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Decrees affirmed.

JEFFREY A. BORN v. PRECISION CASTPARTS CORP. No. 11-P-44.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 9, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

ADOPTION OF SERAFINA. No. 11-P-249.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 10, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. The decree is vacated and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court. Page 1115

COMMONWEALTH v. COREY FRAZER. No. 10-P-2265.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 7, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Order modifying probation affirmed.

DANIEL HARRINGTON v. DOROTHY GIBSON. No. 10-P-1530.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 9, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

LAW OFFICE OF ALFRED PAUL FARESE, JR. v. RICHARD FLORAMO others. No. 11-P-29.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 7, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. So much of the decision and order of the Appellate Division affirming the judgment that dismissed claims against Grace Floramo is modified to provide that the judgment dismissing all claims against […]

ADOPTION OF ROSA (and a companion case). No. 11-P-737.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 8, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Decrees affirmed.

JAMES D. CIRCO v. JOHN DREW others. No. 10-P-1688.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 4, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed. Orders denying plaintiff’s postjudgment motions affirmed.

COMMONWEALTH v. BILLY PHAN. No. 10-P-1370.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 8, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgments affirmed.

COMMONWEALTH v. CELESTAL DUROSS. No. 10-P-1328.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 4, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

COMMONWEALTH v. SHAWQUAN JACKSON. No. 10-P-582.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 4, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

EMORY G. SNELL, JR. v. SUPERINTENDENT, SOUZA BARANOWSKI CORRECTIONAL CENTER, others. No. 09-P-1549.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 4, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

COMMONWEALTH v. BERNARDO NADAL-GINARD. No. 10-P-874.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 8, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Order denying motion for new trial affirmed.

THOMAS E. FENNELLY, petitioner. No. 10-P-1334.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 9, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Order denying petition for writ of habeas corpus affirmed.

COLLEEN McCABE v. PATRICK McCABE. No. 10-P-2270.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 9, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Order dated August 31, 2010, affirmed.

ADOPTION OF PHOEBE. No. 11-P-646.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 4, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Decree affirmed.

EUGENE F. McCARTHY v. MARGARET A. HALE. No. 11-P-96.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 9, 2011. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. Judgment of contempt dated November 12, 2009, reversed. Order awarding attorney’s fees vacated.