663 N.E.2d 587 Archives

COMMONWEALTH v. MARTIN, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 COMMONWEALTH vs. TONY MARTIN. No. 95-P-188.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 11, 1996. Judgment affirmed.

BOUCHARD v. CITY OF BEVERLY, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 L. PHILLIP BOUCHARD OTHERS vs. CITY OF BEVERLY. No. 94-P-1679.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 11, 1996. Judgment affirmed.

RESTO v. F. D. RICH SPRINGFIELD, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 NORMA RESTO vs. F. D. RICH SPRINGFIELD, INC., OTHERS. No. 94-P-1788.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 11, 1996. Judgment reversed.

CASTONGUAY v. CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT APP. B., 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 ROBERT R. CASTONGUAY vs. CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT APPEAL BOARD ANOTHER. No. 95-P-17.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 11, 1996. Judgment affirmed.

LADD v. POLIDORO, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 GEORGE LADD vs. JEFFREY POLIDORO ANOTHER. No. 95-P-872.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 1996. The orders (1) denying the defendants’ motion to amend the counterclaim and to add counterclaim defendants, and (2) denying the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, sanction of dismissal and award of attorneys’ fees are affirmed. The order […]

FERRANTE v. PETERSON, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 DOMENICO FERRANTE ANOTHER vs. EILEEN PETERSON No. 95-P-777.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 10, 1996. Judgment affirmed.

TRIPLETT v. DUBOIS, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 ERVIN TRIPLETT vs. LARRY E. DUBOIS OTHERS. No. 95-P-153.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 1996. The judgment of dismissal should be modified to include a declaration that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

SAWYER v. CHIEF OF POLICE OF ACTION, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 SAMUEL G. SAWYER vs. CHIEF OF POLICE OF ACTION. No. 95-P-503.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 11, 1996. Judgment affirmed.

V M MANAGEMENT v. BOSTON REDEV. AUTH., 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 V M MANAGEMENT, INC. vs. BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OTHERS (AND A COMPANION CASE.) No. 95-P-1604.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 10, 1996. Order denying motion for late docketing of notice of appeal affirmed.

COMMONWEALTH v. HERNANDEZ, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 COMMONWEALTH vs. ISAAC HERNANDEZ. No. 95-P-1865.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 12, 1996. Judgments affirmed.

RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CORP. v. DELGAUDIO, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CORPORATION vs. FRANK R. DELGAUDIO ANOTHER. No. 95-P-41.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 12, 1996. Judgment affirmed.

CIAMPA v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 THOMAS A. CIAMPA vs. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES. No. 94-P-1487.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 12, 1996. We affirm the dismissal of the plaintiff’s APA counts (Counts I and II), and we reverse the dismissal of the plaintiff’s FIPA count (Count III). The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings […]

COMMONWEALTH v. HERRERA, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 COMMONWEALTH vs. BENANCIO HERRERA. No. 95-P-509.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 1996. Judgment reversed. Verdict set aside. Judgment shall enter for the defendant.

PEOPLES HERITAGE SAVINGS BANK v. CONROY, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 PEOPLES HERITAGE SAVINGS BANK vs. JOHN P. CONROY. No. 95-P-645.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 11, 1996. Judgment affirmed.

KUCHINSKY v. COUNTRY BABY MATERNITY, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 OLGA KUCHINSKY vs. COUNTRY BABY AND MATERNITY, INC., OTHERS. No. 95-P-391.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 12, 1996. Judgment affirmed.

SOLOMON v. TUTCIK, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1996)

663 N.E.2d 587 LINDA P. SOLOMON vs. GREGORY L. TUTCIK No. 95-P-500.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 10, 1996. The contempt judgment entered on August 29, 1994, is vacated and the matter is remanded to the Probate Court for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court on file.

Articles Tagged: 663 N.E.2d 587