63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 Archives

KARP-McNAMARA v. KATZ-GOLDBERG, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

LOIS KARP-McNAMARA vs. PHYLLIS S. KATZ-GOLDBERG. No. 04-P-302.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 4, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Order allowing motion to strike affidavit of objections and appearance reversed.

GETTY PROPERTIES CORP. v. RUDGE, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

GETTY PROPERTIES CORP. vs. ROBERT J. RUDGE another. No. 04-P-172.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 1, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

PICARDI v. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

MICHAEL PICARDI vs. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE another. No. 04-P-615.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 6, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

GRAVESON v. J.S. LUIZ, THIRD, INC., 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

KENNETH L. GRAVESON vs. J.S. LUIZ, THIRD, INC., another. No. 04-P-70.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 6, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

COMMONWEALTH v. TRZCINSKI, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

COMMONWEALTH vs. EUGENIUSZ TRZCINSKI. No. 04-P-342.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 6, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

KURKER v. HILL, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

GEORGE K. KURKER vs. EDWIN J. HILL others. No. 03-P-1666.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 6, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

PRENTISS v. COTTON, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

NANCY PRENTISS vs. ALEXANDRA COTTON another. No. 04-P-356.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 6, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

ADOPTION OF OMAR, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

ADOPTION OF OMAR (and a companion case). No. 04-P-1381.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 6, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Decrees affirmed.

LAMBROU v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF PROVINCETOWN, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

GREGORY LAMBROU, trustee, vs. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PROVINCETOWN. No. 03-P-1525.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 30, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The judgment is reversed, and a new judgment is to be entered stating that the decision of the zoning board of appeals denying the special permit did not exceed its authority.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. NARANJO, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE vs. MARCOS NARANJO, JR. No. 03-P-1624.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 1, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The order denying the motion for relief from judgment is reversed. A new order is to enter vacating the paternity judgment.

LANG v. RUDMAN, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

ARTHUR LANG vs. MICHAEL A. RUDMAN others. No. 04-P-560.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 4, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

COMMONWEALTH v. ADILETTO, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

COMMONWEALTH vs. GARY ADILETTO. No. 04-P-14.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 6, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.

ADOPTION OF MARLIN, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

ADOPTION OF MARLIN. No. 04-P-1464.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 6, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Decree affirmed.

PSIROUKIS v. DeSILVA, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

KONSTANTINOS D. PSIROUKIS vs. JUSTIN DeSILVA. No. 04-P-790.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 6, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed. Page 1110 Order dated February 25, 2004, denying plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint, filed February 2, 2004, affirmed.

GORGENS v. McGOVERN, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (2005)

RICHARD A. GORGENS vs. JAMES V. McGOVERN another. No. 03-P-1321.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 1, 2005. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The portion of the February 28, 2002, judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint is affirmed. The portion of the judgment awarding damages to the defendants on their counterclaim pursuant to G.L. c. 93A (count II) […]

Articles Tagged: 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1109