DREW A. MORRIS v. BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY. No. 01-P-1573.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. February 27, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
Articles Tagged: 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119
COMMONWEALTH v. LOWDER, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. RICHARD LOWDER. No. 03-P-293.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. February 27, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
BASER v. GROSS, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
BARBARA BASER v. PAUL R. GROSS. No. 02-P-1579.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 2, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed. Order denying motion for new trial, to amend findings of fact and conclusions of law, to amend judgment, and for reconsideration affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. GRIFFIN G., 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. GRIFFIN G., a juvenile. No. 03-P-403.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 2, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. MONTANEZ, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. JOSEPH J. MONTANEZ. No. 02-P-1332.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 1, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. CLARK, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. RONALD CLARK. No. 03-P-167.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 1, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
WALKER v. WALKER, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
CYNTHIA WALKER v. JOHN DEREK WALKER. No. 02-P-1585.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. February 27, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The modification judgment is vacated, and the judgment nisi, incorporating the parties’ agreement dated March 28, 1996, is reinstated.
GILLESPIE v. CARVER SQUARE CORPORATION, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
LYNN B. GILLESPIE, administratrix, v. CARVER SQUARE CORPORATION, trustee, others. No. 02-P-1053.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 2, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
ADOPTION OF EDGAR, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
ADOPTION OF EDGAR (and three companion cases). No. 03-P-1079.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 2, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Decrees affirmed.
VETRANO v. SCHULL, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
DONNA M. VETRANO v. ROBERT S. SCHULL another. No. 02-P-1518.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 2, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The judgment Page 1120 dismissing the plaintiff’s claim is vacated. The finding of the medical malpractice tribunal is to be replaced by the decision of the Appeals Court that the offer of proof, if […]
COMMONWEALTH v. NUNES, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. NUNES. No. 03-P-46.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 1, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. DUDLEY, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. DAMIAN DUDLEY. No. 03-P-709.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 1, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Order denying motion for postconviction relief affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. KESSLER, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. MICHAEL KESSLER. No. 02-P-1603.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 1, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment reversed. Verdict set aside. Further appellate review granted, 441 Mass. 1107 (2004).
COMMONWEALTH v. COLON, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. JUAN B. COLON. No. 03-P-700.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 1, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. JARRETT, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. NOEL H. JARRETT (and a companion case). No. 03-P-433.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 2, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. CAMPBELL, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. RICHARD CAMPBELL. No. 02-P-1685.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 1, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The judgments of conviction are affirmed, the sentences are vacated and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for resentencing.
TUTTLE v. BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
THOMAS R. TUTTLE v. BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY. No. 02-P-556.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 2, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The judgment shall be amended to declare that the defendant’s acts and omissions as alleged were not in breach of contract. As so amended, the judgment is affirmed.
ADOPTION OF HOGAN, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
ADOPTION OF HOGAN. No. 03-P-1182.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 2, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Decree affirmed.
ISLAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. CAVANAUGH, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
ISLAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. MADALYN A. CAVANAUGH another. No. 02-P-1717.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. February 27, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Denial of motion for joinder or substitution of party plaintiff affirmed. Denial of motion to vacate judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. WILLIAMS, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2004)
COMMONWEALTH v. DIANDER WILLIAMS. No. 03-P-838.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 1, 2004. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.