COMMONWEALTH vs. LUIS E. VASQUEZ. No. 02-P-966.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 16, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
Articles Tagged: 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107
COMMONWEALTH v. MOORE, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
COMMONWEALTH vs. RICHARD MOORE. No. 02-P-1066.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 14, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed. Order denying motion for new trial affirmed.
HENDERSON v. AXIAM, INC., 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
G.L. CABOT HENDERSON others vs. AXIAM, INC., others. No. 01-P-1059.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 16, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. RODRIGUEZ, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
COMMONWEALTH vs. LUIS A. RODRIGUEZ. No. 02-P-756.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 14, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
PRO MEDIA, INC. v. THE TALBOTS, INC., 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
PRO MEDIA, INC. vs. THE TALBOTS, INC. No. 01-P-1391.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 16, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
MORIN v. LEISK, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
CAMILLE B. MORIN vs. WILLIAM H. LEISK. No. 01-P-1369.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 20, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court. Page 1108
COMMONWEALTH v. WILLIAMS, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
COMMONWEALTH vs. ALJAMAAR WILLIAMS. No. 02-P-850.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 14, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. BOUCHARD, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
COMMONWEALTH vs. MARC L. BOUCHARD. No. 01-P-1020.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 20, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
CARE AND PROTECTION OF SANDRA, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
CARE AND PROTECTION OF SANDRA another. No. 03-P-801.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 16, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. ISGUR, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
COMMONWEALTH vs. RUSSELL S. ISGUR. No. 02-P-8.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 17, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. TEHEEN, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
COMMONWEALTH vs. JAMES TEHEEN. No. 01-P-1442.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 14, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. MAY, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
COMMONWEALTH vs. THOL MAY. No. 02-P-1047.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 16, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
LINGA v. LINGA, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
GINA M. LINGA vs. JOHN W. LINGA. No. 02-P-222.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 20, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. The portion of the judgment pertaining to the division of assets is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Probate Court for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court. […]
ALFRED DEFRANCESCHI, JR.’S CASE, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
ALFRED DEFRANCESCHI, JR.’S CASE. No. 02-P-823.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 15, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
TARVEZIAN v. TARVEZIAN, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
RICHARD TARVEZIAN vs. GEORGE TARVEZIAN. No. 02-P-576.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 14, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Order dated August 2, 2001, as of June 7, 2001 (entry number 29), affirmed. Order dated October 10, 2001 (entry number 48), affirmed. Order dated January 9, 2002 (entry number 57), affirmed.
SCOTT v. KEATING, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
LORENZO Q. SCOTT vs. WILLIAM KEATING others. No. 01-P-1220.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 14, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgments of dismissal affirmed.
LEASE RESOLUTION CORP. v. AUT-A-WASH, INC., 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
LEASE RESOLUTION CORPORATION vs. AUT-A-WASH, INC., another. No. 01-P-1168.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 20, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed. Order denying postjudgment motion to amend, to make additional findings, and for a new trial affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. KELLEY, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
COMMONWEALTH vs. TIMOTHY L. KELLEY. No. 02-P-332.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 17, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. BIGGS, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
COMMONWEALTH vs. DEREK BIGGS. No. 00-P-1853.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 20, 2003. Decision pursuant to rule 1:28. Judgments affirmed. Order denying motion for new trial affirmed.