29 N.E.2d 190 B.F. CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. vs. CARLETON F. HOLBROOK. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. November 16, 1938. Exceptions overruled. There is no reason to doubt the truth of the statement of the trial judge with respect to the improper letter sent to him by the attorneys for the defendant that “the letter referred […]
Articles Tagged: 29 N.E.2d 190
SUNDELOF v. SIMCO TRADING CO. INC., 302 Mass. 603 (1939)
29 N.E.2d 190 ANNA SUNDELOF vs. SIMCO TRADING CO. INC. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. February 9, 1939. Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff’s requests for rulings, numbered 5 and 6, were properly denied, since they asked rulings as to the legal effect of a part only of the facts which might have been found, bearing upon […]