181 N.E.2d 686
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts.
March 29, 1962.
Decree affirmed. There was no error in denying the motions for jury issues. The judge could give weight to the affidavits of two witnesses, one the lawyer who drew the will and was named an executor thereof, which, if believed, showed due execution of the will. He evidently did not deem of offsetting significance, and we do not, the statement, based on signed writings of the third witness and of the layman witness whose affidavit was in evidence, that the contestants expected to have evidence of invalid execution.
Douglas Danner for the contestant Anna Farley.
Harry N. Steinberg for the contestant John J. McKearney.
Edward O. Proctor (John F. Reynolds with him) for the proponents.
Commonwealth v. Borgos, 464 Mass. 23 (2012) Dec 21, 2012 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 464 Mass.…
Commonwealth v. Jones, 464 Mass. 16 (2012) Dec 18, 2012 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 464 Mass.…
Charles Edward Crocker & another1 vs. Townsend Oil Company, Incorporated, & others.2 Essex. September 4, 2012.…
Commonwealth v. Buswell, 83 Mass. App. Ct. 1 (2012) Dec 12, 2012 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · No. 10-P-1556…
XL Specialty Insurance v. Massachusetts Highway Department Massachusetts Superior Court 31 Mass. L. Rptr. 147…
464 Mass. 1008 (2013)980 N.E.2d 928 SANDRA CLARK v. BOARD OF REGISTRATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS.…