Categories: Massachusetts Appellate Court Opinions

RESTUCCI v. SUPERIOR COURT DEPT., TRIAL CT., 428 Mass. 1019 (1998)

701 N.E.2d 349

WILLIAM RESTUCCI vs. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT another.[1]

SJC-07857Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts.
November 9, 1998.

[1] Clerk of the Superior Court for Criminal Business in Suffolk County.

Supreme Judicial Court, Appeal from order of single justice.

William Restucci, pro se.

William Restucci (petitioner) appeals pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from the denial of relief by a single justice of this court. A Superior Court judge had denied the petitioner’s request “for temporary relief pending the outcome of a permanent emergency injunction.”

Rule 2:21(2) requires that the petitioner “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The petitioner asserts that the Superior Court judge’s action “is in error and can not be viewed as harmless,” that he suffers “immediate and irreparable harm,” that there are “no other aspects of relief,” and the damages are irreparable. Nevertheless, the petitioner has not met his burden under the rule because he has not provided the requisite explanation why review on appeal, or by other available means, would be inadequate.

Judgment affirmed.

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law.

jdjungle