202 N.E.2d 252
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts.
October 29, 1964.
Orders affirmed. In the matter of the alleged will of the late Miriam A. Nickerson, the contestants made a motion to have jury issues framed on (1) testamentary capacity and (2) fraud and undue
Page 771
influence. The motion was heard on statements of expected evidence and the testimony of one witness. The judge allowed the motion on the first ground and denied it on the second. From the order framing an issue on the first ground the proponents appealed; from the order refusing to frame an issue on the second ground, the contestants appealed. We have examined the evidence and statements of expected evidence, in the light of the familiar governing principles, and are of opinion that the decision of the judge ought not to be disturbed.
W. Warner Lang for the proponents.
Howard F. Ryan for the contestants.
Commonwealth v. Borgos, 464 Mass. 23 (2012) Dec 21, 2012 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 464 Mass.…
Commonwealth v. Jones, 464 Mass. 16 (2012) Dec 18, 2012 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 464 Mass.…
Charles Edward Crocker & another1 vs. Townsend Oil Company, Incorporated, & others.2 Essex. September 4, 2012.…
Commonwealth v. Buswell, 83 Mass. App. Ct. 1 (2012) Dec 12, 2012 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · No. 10-P-1556…
XL Specialty Insurance v. Massachusetts Highway Department Massachusetts Superior Court 31 Mass. L. Rptr. 147…
464 Mass. 1008 (2013)980 N.E.2d 928 SANDRA CLARK v. BOARD OF REGISTRATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS.…