COTE v. JUDGE OF SECOND DISTRICT COURT, 225 Mass. 123 (1916)

113 N.E. 777

ARMIDAS J. COTE vs. JUDGE OF SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF EASTERN MIDDLESEX.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Middlesex.October 16, 1916.
October 20, 1916.

Present: RUGG, C.J., LORING, BRALEY, PIERCE, CARROLL, JJ.

Practice, Civil, Appeal. Mandamus.
No appeal lies from an order made by a single justice dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus.

BY THE COURT. This petition for a writ of mandamus was dismissed by the single justice.[*] The petitioner appealed.

No appeal lies from a decision of a justice of this court in a

Page 124

proceeding at law. Alleged errors of law can be considered only on exceptions or by report. R.L.c. 173, § 96, as amended by St. 1906, c. 342, § 2, and St. 1910, c. 555, § 4. Channell v. Judge of Central District Court of Northern Essex, 213 Mass. 78.

It is not improper to add that manifestly no error of law is disclosed on this record.

Order dismissing petition affirmed.

The case was submitted on a brief by the plaintiff.

A.J. Cote, pro se.