865 N.E.2d 1140 COMMONWEALTH v. STANLEY WEBB. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. May 2, 2007. Reported below: 68 Mass. App. Ct. 167 (2007). Orders Further appellate review granted:
Category: Massachusetts Appellate Court Opinions
BOGASH v. STUDIOS, INC., 303 Mass. 207 (1939)
21 N.E.2d 235 BRUNO BOGASH vs. STUDIOS, INC. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Suffolk.April 5, 1939. May 23, 1939. Present: FIELD, C.J., DONAHUE, DOLAN, COX, RONAN, JJ. Frauds, Statute of. Time. Contract, Of employment. Evidence, Presumptions and burden of proof. After the defendant in an action of contract has pleaded the statute of frauds, the […]
MONIZ v. COMNR. CORRECTION, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2003)
782 N.E.2d 557 GLENN MONIZ vs. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION others. No. 01-P-1216.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. February 5, 2003 Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. O’LEARY, 401 Mass. 1105 (1988)
COMMONWEALTH vs. JOSEPH O’LEARY. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. February 26, 1988 Further appellate review denied: Reported below: 25 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (1987). MR. JUSTICE LIACOS did not participate.
MACHT v. MURPHY, 66 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 (2006)
SUZANNE MACHT v. ROSANNE MURPHY, individually and as executrix, others. No. 05-P-986.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. July 19, 2006. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed. Page 1118
COMMONWEALTH v. HALL, 413 Mass. 1102 (1992)
COMMONWEALTH vs. DEREK WESLEY HALL. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. June 30, 1992 Further appellate review denied: Reported below: 32 Mass. App. Ct. 951 (1992).
COMMONWEALTH v. WOODLEY, 423 Mass. 1113 (1996)
COMMONWEALTH vs. PAUL M. WOODLEY. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. November 21, 1996 Further appellate review denied: Reported below: 41 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (1996).
WILSON v. MASS. INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 188 Mass. 565 (1905)
75 N.E. 128 CECIL P. WILSON vs. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. MARY I. WELLS vs. SAME. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Suffolk.December 1, 1904. September 6, 1905. Present: MORTON, LATHROP, BARKER, HAMMOND, LORING, BRALEY, JJ. Equitable Restrictions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. St. 1861, c. 183, which incorporated the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, granted to that […]
DANA v. TREASURER RECEIVER GENERAL, 227 Mass. 562 (1917)
116 N.E. 941 RICHARD H. DANA, executor, vs. TREASURER AND RECEIVER GENERAL another. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Middlesex.October 20, 1916. June 29, 1917. Present: RUGG, C. J., LORING, BRALEY, PIERCE, CARROLL, JJ. Tax, On legacies and successions. Trust, Character of transferable certificate of ownership in partnership and trust property. Partnership. Voluntary Association. The general […]
ADOPTION OF ISADOR, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1106 (2004)
816 N.E.2d 182 ADOPTION OF ISADOR (and a companion case). No. 04-P-474.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 20, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Decrees affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. CAHOON, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 1126 (1994)
644 N.E.2d 266 COMMONWEALTH vs. KEVIN F. CAHOON. No. 93-P-1151.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. December 27, 1994. Judgments affirmed.
BROWN v. CLARK, 34 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 (1993)
613 N.E.2d 140 ROBERT F. BROWN vs. ROBERT G. CLARK, THIRD. No. 92-P-1071.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 22, 1993. Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. BURNS, 362 Mass. 875 (1972)
289 N.E.2d 836 COMMONWEALTH vs. JOHN BURNS. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. October 24, 1972. The defendant and Lawrence J. Jemmott were each convicted of the following crimes committed against Anthony M. Durham: (a) armed robbery, (b) entering a dwelling house while armed and assaulting an occupant with intent to rob him, and (c) assault […]
DEPARTMENT PUB. UTIL. v. NEW YORK, N.H. H., 304 Mass. 664 (1939)
24 N.E.2d 647 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES vs. TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTIES OF THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY others. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Suffolk.December 7, 1939. December 29, 1939. Present: FIELD, C.J., DONAHUE, LUMMUS, COX, RONAN, JJ. Equity Jurisdiction, To enforce order of department of public utilities, Remedy at law. […]
BLAKE v. PORTNOY, 28 Mass. App. Ct. 1104 (1989)
547 N.E.2d 1149 MATTHEW A. BLAKE another vs. BERNARD PORTNOY. No. 89-P-315.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. December 8, 1989. The judgment and the present decision of the medical malpractice tribunal in favor of the defendant are vacated. The decision is to be replaced by a new decision to the effect that the plaintiffs’ offer of proof […]
COMMONWEALTH v. BROWN, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 1125 (2008)
887 N.E.2d 312 COMMONWEALTH v. ZACQUELENE BROWN. No. 07-P-213.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. May 16, 2008. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. The convictions are affirmed; the sentence is vacated; and the case is remanded for resentencing.
PATTERSON v. MARKEY, 22 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 (1986)
494 N.E.2d 69 WILLIAM PATTERSON vs. JOHN F. MARKEY another. Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 24, 1986. The judgment is reversed, and a new judgment is to be entered which annuls the decision of the board of appeals as in excess of its authority.
KINGSLEY v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSP. AUTH., 1 Mass. App. Ct. 838 (1973)
300 N.E.2d 449 ANNA KINGSLEY vs. MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Appeals Court of Massachusetts. August 31, 1973. This is an action of tort to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in an accident which occurred on the defendant’s premises. The case is before us on the plaintiff’s exceptions to rulings of the trial […]
SHEEHAN v. OBEY, 346 Mass. 785 (1964)
196 N.E.2d 223 DANIEL F. SHEEHAN, JR., vs. EDWARD S. OBEY. MAURICE S. GLASER, intervener. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. January 30, 1964. Decree affirmed with costs of appeal. The plaintiff (Sheehan) brought this bill in equity pursuant to a sealed instrument to enjoin the defendant (Obey) from levying on certain property on which he […]
COMMONWEALTH v. KIMBALL K., 65 Mass. App. Ct. 1116 (2006)
COMMONWEALTH vs. KIMBALL K., a juvenile. No. 05-P-1452.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. February 6, 2006. Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Adjudication of delinquency reversed. Verdict set aside.