134 N.E.2d 442 ALBERT COHEN’S CASE. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Suffolk.February 9, 1956. May 8, 1956. Present: QUA, C.J., RONAN, SPALDING, COUNIHAN, WHITTEMORE, JJ. Workmen’s Compensation Act, Specific compensation. Under subsection (i) of § 36 of the workmen’s compensation act, G.L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152, as appearing in St. 1952, c. 60, an employee […]
Category: Massachusetts Appellate Court Opinions
COMMONWEALTH v. PYBURN CONSTRUCTION CORP., 17 Mass. App. Ct. 927 (1983)
456 N.E.2d 480 COMMONWEALTH vs. PYBURN CONSTRUCTION CORP. Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 25, 1983. Practice, Criminal, Mistrial, Double jeopardy. A judge presiding over the trial to a jury of six of a complaint framed under G.L.c. 90, § 19A, obviously disturbed by several improprieties in the closing argument of defense counsel, declared a mistrial […]
COMMONWEALTH v. JACKSON, 430 Mass. 1115 (1999)
724 N.E.2d 709 COMMONWEALTH vs. SAM A. JACKSON, JR. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. January 26, 2000. Further appellate review denied:
COMMONWEALTH v. SIBINICH, 413 Mass. 1107 (1992)
COMMONWEALTH vs. DAVID L. SIBINICH. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. October 26, 1992 Further appellate review denied: Reported below: 33 Mass. App. Ct. 246 (1992).
COMMONWEALTH v. BRUNO, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (1987)
509 N.E.2d 308 COMMONWEALTH vs. JAMES BRUNO. Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 22, 1987. Judgments affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. VANHOUTUM, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 1126 (1996)
665 N.E.2d 1039 COMMONWEALTH vs. DIANNA D. VANHOUTUM. No. 95-P-1652.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 5, 1996. Judgment affirmed.
UNITED STATES TR. CO. v. COMMONWEALTH, 245 Mass. 75 (1923)
139 N.E. 794 UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY vs. COMMONWEALTH. EXCHANGE TRUST COMPANY vs. SAME. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Suffolk.November 21, 1922. May 23, 1923. Present: RUGG, C.J., DeCOURCY, CROSBY, CARROLL, JJ. Taxation, Excise on corporate franchise. Trust Company. An investment by a trust company of funds, either of its commercial department or of a […]
MITCHELL v. UIPE PRODUCTS, INC., 38 Mass. App. Ct. 1113 (1995)
647 N.E.2d 449 FREDDIE MITCHELL vs. UIPE PRODUCTS, INC., another. No. 94-P-1018.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. March 13, 1995. The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion on file with the Appeals Court.
COMMONWEALTH v. SILVA, 25 Mass. App. Ct. 220 (1987)
517 N.E.2d 182 COMMONWEALTH vs. JAMES E. SILVA, JR. No. 86-722.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. Bristol.April 21, 1987. December 31, 1987. Present: DREBEN, QUIRICO, SMITH, JJ. Homicide. Felony-Murder Rule. Constitutional Law, Assistance of counsel. Practice, Criminal, New trial, Appeal. No error appeared in the denial of a criminal defendant’s motion for new trial based on claims […]
CLEMONS ELECTRICAL MANUF. CO. v. WALTON, 206 Mass. 215 (1910)
92 N.E. 459 CLEMONS ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY vs. WILLIAM A. WALTON. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Bristol.March 1, 1910. June 24, 1910. Present: KNOWLTON, C.J., MORTON, HAMMOND, LORING, BRALEY, JJ. Street Railway, Sale of property. Evidence, Relevancy and materiality, Remoteness. The provisions of Pub. Sts. c. 113, § 56, which now are included in St. […]
ATAMIAN SUBARU v. FAFARD, 396 Mass. 1106 (1986)
ATAMIAN SUBARU, INC. v. HOWARD A. FAFARD another. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. February 27, 1986. Further appellate review denied: Reported below: 21 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (1986).
COMMONWEALTH v. DURHAM, 446 Mass. 212 (2006)
COMMONWEALTH v. PATRICK JOHN DURHAM. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Suffolk.November 10, 2005. March 14, 2006. Present: MARSHALL, C.J., GREANEY, IRELAND, SPINA, COWIN, SOSMAN, CORDY, JJ. Practice, Criminal, Discovery, Reciprocal discovery, Confrontation of witnesses, Assistance of counsel. Attorney at Law, Work product. Constitutional Law, Confrontation of witnesses, Self-incrimination, Assistance of counsel, Fair trial. Fair Trial. […]
COMMONWEALTH v. LEATHER, 42 Mass. App. Ct. 1116 (1997)
COMMONWEALTH vs. FRED LEATHER. No. 96-P-922.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. April 16, 1997. Judgments affirmed.
SULLIVAN v. WATKINS, 66 Mass. App. Ct. 1118 (2006)
SHAWNA SULLIVAN v. PAUL WATKINS. No. 05-P-1552.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. July 21, 2006. Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Order dated June 20, 2005, affirmed.[*] [*] This decision pursuant to Rule 1:28 has been withdrawn by the Appeals Court. See 67 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (2006). — REPORTER.
COMMONWEALTH v. HOOD., 438 Mass. 1105 (2003)
782 N.E.2d 515 COMMONWEALTH vs. CRAIG HOOD. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. January 7, 2003. Further appellate review denied: Reported below: 56 Mass. App. Ct. 1106 (2002).
COMMONWEALTH v. JONES, 17 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (1983)
455 N.E.2d 1241 COMMONWEALTH vs. RAYMOND JONES. Appeals Court of Massachusetts. October 26, 1983. Judgments affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. ROMAN, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 733 (1997)
686 N.E.2d 218 COMMONWEALTH vs. ANGEL ROMAN. No. 94-P-658.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. Hampden.Argued December 18, 1996. Decided November 4, 1997. Present: Armstrong, Brown, Dreben, JJ. Further appellate review granted, 426 Mass. 1109 (1998). Assault and Battery by Means of a Dangerous Weapon. Practice, Criminal, Required finding. In a criminal case, the judge erred in allowing […]
COMMONWEALTH v. HERNANDEZ, 56 Mass. App. Ct. 1110 (2002)
COMMONWEALTH vs. JUNIOR HERNANDEZ. 01-P-1228.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. November 21, 2002 Judgment affirmed.
COMMONWEALTH v. EWE, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 901 (1997)
680 N.E.2d 1184 COMMONWEALTH vs. SAMUEL EWE.[1] No. 96-P-1029.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. June 27, 1997. [1] A pseudonym. Proceedings in this case were impounded by order of a single justice because the defendant’s actions in the case resemble those of a confidential informer. Practice, Criminal, Agreement between prosecutor and defendant, Plea. In return for a […]
COMMONWEALTH v. PAYANO, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 1116 (2004)
820 N.E.2d 274 COMMONWEALTH vs. MARISOL PAYANO. No. 03-P-1630.Appeals Court of Massachusetts. December 24, 2004. DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Order denying motion for new trial affirmed.