589 N.E.2d 1256
No. 90-P-1001.Appeals Court of Massachusetts.
April 1, 1992.
So much of the judgment as declared that the defendants unreasonably refused to approve the plaintiffs’ plan and that Lot #23 is subject to the plan approval provision of the restrictions for the duration of the restrictions and as dismissed the defendants’ counterclaim is affirmed. So much of the judgment as ordered that the plaintiffs recover damages in the amount of $75 and attorney’s fees and expenses in the sum of $6,181.25 is reversed. The matter is remanded for the entry of an amended judgment ordering that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the statutory amount of $25 and attorney’s fees and expenses in the sum of $12,212.50.